Position the mouse over the spoiler boxes to read. If you haven't seen these movies then my comments probably won't make any sense.
Science fiction, time travel, action. Could be interesting...
This movie was a bit meh; the story was not strong, the dialogue was not strong, the characters were not strong. The main protagonist seemed to be like "OK, yeah" to anything. Parts of the story didn't make sense. I think there were some decent actors and it's a shame they were wasted.
00h25m Why are they spending so much time on irrelevant exposition, when are we going to get to the main storyline?
01h45m Oh. So it was just obvious set up material.
(Huge spoiler alert) How can the whitespikes have the volcanic dust in their claws if they were held in stasis on the alien craft until it thawed in 2048?
It's always worrying when I stream a movie and the first few minutes are unwatchable because there is so much fast CG that the compression cannot cope with it (compression for movies is usually biased towards natural video so you know there's too much computer generated imagery when you get massive amounts of artefacts).
What were they thinking? I thought this was going to be a slightly Lynda Carter-ish version of the same broody, dark and mysterious Gal Gadot Wonder Woman we're familiar with in her other outings but instead there was some dull story with a confused 1970s cheesy backdrop and cardboard cut out characters.
I gave up watching after 40 minutes because it was so tedious and I didn't want to waste my evening.
Awesome and compelling storyline; even though I guessed some of the direction of the story it was interesting to see how it played out.
The future could have sent back inverted soldiers with a complete inverted bomb instead of trying to recruit someone to build one with several pieces sent separately. Or they could have sent people back to influence the past and avoided the problems that plagued the future.
The visuals looked really good and made a believable world; the acting was very good too.
It just didn't make sense: Pandora Shaw didn't trust Thaddeus Valentine so had a baby with him (maybe?), feared him, showed him a piece of a super weapon and in her dying breath gave the kill switch to her daughter so she could stop him. I'm sure it was all explained in the book, but the movie has to stand by itself.
I enjoyed the previous movies in the series even though they're not exactly cerebral.
It seemed like the movie was about Gerard Butler wheezing his way through a heart attack.
Apart from the use of drones and the cars, this movie is straight out of 1985.
This movie got panned but I found it surprisingly OK. To be honest I wasn't expecting too much.
Forgetting the Emperor-clone thing; I found the whole secret map to the Sith homeworld story a bit nonsensical when they manufacture and crew a secret fleet there. Even if the ships were manufactured elsewhere the resources to supply all those ships must have been very un-secret.
It was a real crying shame that this movie couldn't be the one focused on the Leia character.
It's a movie based on a comicbook superhero so you can't be too picky about the story making sense.
But they could have done a lot to modify the story and make it sensible. For example, the Kree can travel through wormholes effectively faster than the speed of light, so what use would a FTL drive be?
In a massive explosion, a dog tag got blown in half and a human absorbed a spaceship engine? Really?
Interesting to see how a team of women would plan and execute a heist. Or at least from a woman's point of view as the story is by Lynda La Plante.
I don't get Harry's plan: he stole $5m from Jamal Manning, who knew it was him. But then he needed to steal more money from his wife? Remember his wife only had a share of what was left after paying back the debt.
The first 5 films were fun, but the first 3 were better than 4 and 5. This movie is certainly no worse than 3, 4 or 5 and you should definitely see it if you enjoyed 1 or 2.
Some inconsistencies in the series story line. It's a shame they couldn't get Michelle Rodriguez or Li Bingbing to come back. I didn't realise they dubbed Li Bingbing's voice; it's not surprising she didn't want to return.
At the end, Nick effectively becomes a god and decides the thing he wants to do is resurrect his friend and go ride horses in the desert?
Jenny's only role after finding Ahmanet seems to be to shout "Nick!"
When Ahmanet was awakened, what was her motivation for helping Set? Egypt has totally changed and doesn't offer the power that it once had.
The first Mummy movie was much more fun.
As a fan of the original anime, I was surprised that they didn't botch this. They did a good job of rewriting the story while retaining most of the original scenes albeit in a different order.
The protagonist shouldn't have been called "Major" as if that was her name and she should have worn a veil to cover her head when using the thermoptic camoflage.
I wonder if Scarlett Johansson had any thoughts on the idea that her body was as good as one designed to be perfect.
I really liked the "Zordon wall" effect and the back story of Zordon and Rita being former Power Rangers.
It took way too long for the rangers to get their armour. It was like they stretched out a single episode to make a full length movie but didn't add any extra detail.
Evil characters are not so scary when you can't hear what they are mumbling. Plodding and obvious story. Disappointing.
So Matt Damon's character was the bestest fighter in all of asia. far superior to any fighter living there. They shouldn't even try.
The only way the Empire can get good engineers these days is to kidnap them, kill their families, force them to work on designing mega weapons, then promote them to a high rank. The Dilbert principle is alive in a galaxy far, far away.
A million times better than any of the prequels.
Although everyone who is gifted in the force takes several years of training, Rey can best an experienced and trained force user (who has followed the dark side and thus learnt quicker) even though she barely even knows anything about the force and had to be told by Han "the stories were true". She had no reason to try to use the force to persuade the guard to let her go after she was captured.
How did R2D2 work out where the fragment of map fitted into the map of the universe when he was shutdown? How is it that only R2D2 could work out where it fitted, hadn't they been using other computers to try to find it?
Engaging story and Jack Reacher is a good character.
Tom Cruise is too short and isn't tough or gritty enough to be Jack Reacher.
Fortunately, he manages a performance that overcomes most of this problem.
A scientifically accurate movie that is entertaining. Finally!
Hated the cheesy music. It seemed like a lazy excuse to skip having to make a soundtrack. I don't know if it was in the original book, but I could have done without it.
I know there was a lot of criticism about The Hobbit, but I enjoyed it, it really brought the world of middle earth to life.
I think there was more than enough story in the original book to not need Peter Jackson to add his own additional material that was never there. However, I can understand how some parts of the story had A to C where B seems to be missing and he felt a need to show that.
I liked how they moved on from the original story; the new grid looked fantastic.
It's such a shame that the action was so slow paced, there were 3 main action sequences: breaking in and base jumping at the start, the light cycle battle and the dog fight at the end but none of them were exciting. Cillian Murphy and Bruce Boxleitner were wasted.
Kind of like a cross between Eon (Greg Bear) and Babel-17 (Samuel Delany).
It seems a bit grim for the protagonist to start a relationship with the foreknowledge that she will have a child and it will die.
Fun movie if you ignore the (lack of) science.
Horribly fake Hollywood version of academia. Why don't script writers ever visit a real university as part of their research?
How is it that Lucy was living in Taiwan without a job ? Her ultimate evolved state was a USB thumb drive?